It is the time of year for greed guides. Recently Uncle Bulgaria’s Wine Companion hit the shelves, and hit them in a way that the shelves certainly knew they were hit. This annual guide to Australian wine is a wonderful phone book, should anyone wish to contact the wineries listed. It also subtly suggests those wineries which make good wine and those wines which are of high quality. It does this by giving every winery listed a 5 Star rating out of 5 Stars, and giving all the wines listed a score out of 100 points. This score is either 95, or 96, or 97, or 98. Or possibly 99, or 100, or even 101. I know it sounds complex, but with the book in your hands everything makes instant sense. Proper wines for proper postcodes. If only we had such a guide to boat people.
The other guide about to set us all violently right is The Good Food Guide. This is another good phone book, albeit a lot of the numbers listed no longer answer. It is also a very useful dictionary of synonyms. Scan through the book and you will come across more ways to say ‘ambience’ than you thought possible, which is a very handy thing. If ambience were mere ambience then goodness knows what might happen next. Restaurant goers might soon start thinking a potato is just a potato.
If only wine guides could encourage people to not think in terms of scores, and if only restaurant guides could teach people how to actually eat in a restaurant, then they might prove to be useful publications yet.
Saturday, August 28, 2010
Saturday, July 31, 2010
Black Tot Day
On this day 40 years ago sailors suddenly had no more reason to go to sea. On the 31st July 1970, at 11am – or 6 bells during the forenoon watch – the Royal Navy ladled out their last tots of rum to each and every seaman afloat. An eighth of a pint – about 70mls – was the measure, although when rum tots first appeared around 1731 each man received a half pint – and that was a pre-Imperial half pint, so roughly 235mls.
Between 1731 and 1970 the tot went through various service manifestations. After a while it was watered down at a ratio of 3 parts rum to 1 part water, then 2:1; the tot was also broken into two serves – morning and evening; and it even had lime juice added to help prevent scurvy. A kind of prescription Mai Tai…
But in the end Britain’s House of Commons decided that modern war ships had too much gadgetry in them to be operated safely by drunken sailors. The tot was abolished, replaced by an extra can of beer per man per day. Which going all the way back to 1731 was what rum had itself replaced – a wine gallon of beer a day was the sailor’s right in the early 18th Century. A wine gallon? Yes, about 3.7 litres. Or 10 stubbies. It was small beer, though, roughly 2.5% alcohol by volume. Which I think makes it sound even worse. Try drinking 10 stubbies of light beer day in day out and see how intellectually uplifted you become…
It would be nice to think there is a navy somewhere still serving the daily tot of rum, but I’m not sure. The Royal Australian Navy abolished the rum tot in 1921 – the first Commonwealth country to do so. We’ve been a bunch of Nannies longer than I thought.
Between 1731 and 1970 the tot went through various service manifestations. After a while it was watered down at a ratio of 3 parts rum to 1 part water, then 2:1; the tot was also broken into two serves – morning and evening; and it even had lime juice added to help prevent scurvy. A kind of prescription Mai Tai…
But in the end Britain’s House of Commons decided that modern war ships had too much gadgetry in them to be operated safely by drunken sailors. The tot was abolished, replaced by an extra can of beer per man per day. Which going all the way back to 1731 was what rum had itself replaced – a wine gallon of beer a day was the sailor’s right in the early 18th Century. A wine gallon? Yes, about 3.7 litres. Or 10 stubbies. It was small beer, though, roughly 2.5% alcohol by volume. Which I think makes it sound even worse. Try drinking 10 stubbies of light beer day in day out and see how intellectually uplifted you become…
It would be nice to think there is a navy somewhere still serving the daily tot of rum, but I’m not sure. The Royal Australian Navy abolished the rum tot in 1921 – the first Commonwealth country to do so. We’ve been a bunch of Nannies longer than I thought.
Monday, June 14, 2010
The Shockeroos
The poor Australian football team. Losing 4 – 0 to Germany in the opening match of their world cup campaign will be a loss too far, it seems. At least if they are dubbed the ‘Shockeroos’, it will grate less in the minds of real football supporters than their current team nickname – the Socceroos. Football is football, not soccer. Even that Americanism, ‘soccer mom’, is more palatable than ‘Socceroos’.
A win was always impossible against Germany; a draw would have been biblical; a 1 – 0 loss would have been thought proud; but 4 – 0… Blame has to be found. And it looks like the team’s Dutch coach, Pim Verbeek, is the one. He made selection errors, it is claimed, and no one is prepared to forgive him. This is a sad state for this rakish and charismatic man to find himself in. How quickly the tide of public sentiment has turned against ‘Aussie Pim’, as he came to be known during his brief but very media-friendly engagement to Lleyton Hewitt.
Western Samoan footballer, Tim Cahill, who was sent off in the game’s 56th minute, will now miss Australia’s next must-win match against Ghana, known colloquially as the ‘Black Stars’. Cahill, or ‘Aussie Tim’ as he became popularly known during his brief but much admired engagement to Australian tennis ace, Lleyton Hewitt, seems the only player in the squad likely to score, and a 0 – 0 result against Ghana will not do.
But how amusing would it be if from Group F, the New Zealanders - I'm sorry, the All Whites - should get through to the next round...
A win was always impossible against Germany; a draw would have been biblical; a 1 – 0 loss would have been thought proud; but 4 – 0… Blame has to be found. And it looks like the team’s Dutch coach, Pim Verbeek, is the one. He made selection errors, it is claimed, and no one is prepared to forgive him. This is a sad state for this rakish and charismatic man to find himself in. How quickly the tide of public sentiment has turned against ‘Aussie Pim’, as he came to be known during his brief but very media-friendly engagement to Lleyton Hewitt.
Western Samoan footballer, Tim Cahill, who was sent off in the game’s 56th minute, will now miss Australia’s next must-win match against Ghana, known colloquially as the ‘Black Stars’. Cahill, or ‘Aussie Tim’ as he became popularly known during his brief but much admired engagement to Australian tennis ace, Lleyton Hewitt, seems the only player in the squad likely to score, and a 0 – 0 result against Ghana will not do.
But how amusing would it be if from Group F, the New Zealanders - I'm sorry, the All Whites - should get through to the next round...
Friday, May 28, 2010
Her Majesty's Birthday. Not.
June is nearly upon us, featuring as it does Her Majesty’s Birthday’s public holiday, on the second Monday of the month. Her Majesty’s actual birthday falls – as all Australians know, of course – on the 21st April. Why Australia’s dutiful and respectful observance of its monarch’s birthday occurs on this June date is down to rather odd circumstances. Until very, very recently – 1936 – our monarchs’ birthday public holidays were celebrated on the actual day of birth, a tradition which goes back to one of the earliest tourists to this country, Governor Arthur Philip, who established the day in 1788, to mark the birthday of George III, which is – as of course we all know – the 4th June. Yet 148 years later, following His Majesty George V’s passing (20th January; His birthday was 3rd June, of course), the date was set in administrative stone, and for some strange reason those administrators chose the second Monday in June. Contrary to some popular theories held by silly old people, this second Monday in June is not the day formerly known as Empire or Commonwealth Day, which was Queen Victoria’s birthday, the 24th May. Be all that as it may, the second Monday in June is what we now have. I for one would like to see public holidays (without pay) observed for all our monarchs’ birthdays, going back to, say, 1603. It would amount to 17 public holidays a year, the majority of them falling in late May, early June, and November. Perhaps I am far too forward-thinking when it comes to recognizing these birthdays? Yet that is the bold spirit to embrace – to dare to dream of a better and more enlightened future for us all. An Australia anew.
Saturday, April 24, 2010
Raise a Glass, or perhaps a Caffé Latte
Poor old ANZAC Day. What a transformation it has undergone.
When I was little, in that unfortunate decade, the 1970s, Dawn Service was attended by old returned servicemen – men who had gone to war and many of whom had fought. Following the Service – at places like Melbourne’s Shrine of Remembrance – the old soldiers would totter off to a few pubs holding early morning liquor licences, where from about 7am beer was served and drunk.
As the decade wore on the number of diggers dwindled. Occasionally the ANZAC Day parade would get into the news, particularly if demonstrators placarded the march, complaining that it glorified the horrors of war.
By the end of the century, however, how things had changed. A new generation of Australians so distantly and remotely linked to war took to ANZAC Day like an RSL regular to his club’s bar. On the 25th of April at Shrines around Australia stood tens of thousands of people; Gallipoli resembled a Bledisloe Cup fixture.
With this popular swing in favour of the Day there have also come some strange attendants.
Near Melbourne’s Shrine sits Café Vue – an offshoot of the internationally acclaimed restaurant in Melbourne’s city centre, Vue du monde. It released this electronic message a few days before ANZAC Day this year:
“With the endorsement of the RSL, Café Vue at 401 St Kilda Road will be open on Anzac Day, Sunday 26th April from 5am for express coffee and pastries and from 7am with a full liquor license and breakfast menu. We are pleased to offer all serving and ex-service Defence Force members a 50% discount on food and beverage from 5am to midday.”
For some strange reason this information unsettled me. I turned off the computer and turned on the television. Very quickly an ad came on featuring General Peter Cosgrove, former Chief of the Australian Defence Force. He was sitting in a pub with a glass of beer. A couple of blokes stood in the background doing ditto. Cosgrove encouraged the viewer to ‘raise a glass’ on ANZAC Day and remember or donate to the "Raise a Glass" cause.
This is not a new campaign; indeed, “Raise a Glass” got into trouble in 2009 when the Queensland RSL refused to take part in it, stating that it thought it linked ANZAC Day to problem binge drinking. Oh, Victoria Bitter is the ‘sponsor’; the beer’s cartons come with commemorative decals for the ANZAC period, and the brewer donates money to the RSL and Legacy. They hope to raise $1.3 million in 2010.
I wonder what Sir John Monash – Australia’s greatest army commander, and the man who did so much to establish ANZAC Day and supervise the planning of Melbourne’s Shrine of Remembrance – would have to say about these new developments.
When I was little, in that unfortunate decade, the 1970s, Dawn Service was attended by old returned servicemen – men who had gone to war and many of whom had fought. Following the Service – at places like Melbourne’s Shrine of Remembrance – the old soldiers would totter off to a few pubs holding early morning liquor licences, where from about 7am beer was served and drunk.
As the decade wore on the number of diggers dwindled. Occasionally the ANZAC Day parade would get into the news, particularly if demonstrators placarded the march, complaining that it glorified the horrors of war.
By the end of the century, however, how things had changed. A new generation of Australians so distantly and remotely linked to war took to ANZAC Day like an RSL regular to his club’s bar. On the 25th of April at Shrines around Australia stood tens of thousands of people; Gallipoli resembled a Bledisloe Cup fixture.
With this popular swing in favour of the Day there have also come some strange attendants.
Near Melbourne’s Shrine sits Café Vue – an offshoot of the internationally acclaimed restaurant in Melbourne’s city centre, Vue du monde. It released this electronic message a few days before ANZAC Day this year:
“With the endorsement of the RSL, Café Vue at 401 St Kilda Road will be open on Anzac Day, Sunday 26th April from 5am for express coffee and pastries and from 7am with a full liquor license and breakfast menu. We are pleased to offer all serving and ex-service Defence Force members a 50% discount on food and beverage from 5am to midday.”
For some strange reason this information unsettled me. I turned off the computer and turned on the television. Very quickly an ad came on featuring General Peter Cosgrove, former Chief of the Australian Defence Force. He was sitting in a pub with a glass of beer. A couple of blokes stood in the background doing ditto. Cosgrove encouraged the viewer to ‘raise a glass’ on ANZAC Day and remember or donate to the "Raise a Glass" cause.
This is not a new campaign; indeed, “Raise a Glass” got into trouble in 2009 when the Queensland RSL refused to take part in it, stating that it thought it linked ANZAC Day to problem binge drinking. Oh, Victoria Bitter is the ‘sponsor’; the beer’s cartons come with commemorative decals for the ANZAC period, and the brewer donates money to the RSL and Legacy. They hope to raise $1.3 million in 2010.
I wonder what Sir John Monash – Australia’s greatest army commander, and the man who did so much to establish ANZAC Day and supervise the planning of Melbourne’s Shrine of Remembrance – would have to say about these new developments.
Monday, March 29, 2010
Mark Webber for PM
"It's a great country, but we've got to be responsible for our actions..."
Even without context this comment should be applauded by any right-thinking individual. Yet this has got nice Mark Webber - the racing car driver originally from Queanbeyan in the ACT - into problems with Victoran government ministers and servants - AKA policeman.
Mr. Webber - upon returning to his home country to appear in the Formula 1 race in Melbourne - thought that Australia was now suffering from the affliction known as 'nanny government'. This is a condition in which citizens of their country are excessively governed and monitored and regulated by the very government they freely elect.
Mr. Webber made his nanny state comments in relation to speeding limits, parking regulations, and - one can only imagine - other aspects of local government road rules that so annoy any free spirit in charge of a motor vehicle. He complained about ''dodging the ridiculous speeding and parking [rules] and all the nanny-state [conditions] that we have down here in Australia''.
Yet he was also more broad-ranging in his thoughts:
"''I think we've got to read an instruction book when we get out of bed - what we can do and what we can't do … put a yellow vest on and all that sort of stuff...''
His off the cuff comments didn't suit the new moral crusaders, however. Taking time out from ad nauseum 'when-are-you-people-going-to-learn' remarks, various policemen and government ministers attacked Mr. Webber's free thought.
Deputy Police Commissioner Ken Lay said some of Webber’s fans were alive because of Victoria’s aggressive approach to road safety.
‘‘We’ve got probably one of the best road safety track records in the world, so I make no apology for our aggressive approach,’’ he told a local radio station.
No apology. Aggressive indeed. This is the voice of the self-empowered moral high groundsmen. Mark Webber made a observation, based on his experience as a international journeyman and - no doubt - from a fond remembrance of his younger life here in Australia.
But that has all changed. In the future whether young men from Queanbeyan grow up to become F1 drivers is neither here nor there; but if they grow up and cannot question the laws that govern their existence, then we might all just as well hand our car keys in now.
Even without context this comment should be applauded by any right-thinking individual. Yet this has got nice Mark Webber - the racing car driver originally from Queanbeyan in the ACT - into problems with Victoran government ministers and servants - AKA policeman.
Mr. Webber - upon returning to his home country to appear in the Formula 1 race in Melbourne - thought that Australia was now suffering from the affliction known as 'nanny government'. This is a condition in which citizens of their country are excessively governed and monitored and regulated by the very government they freely elect.
Mr. Webber made his nanny state comments in relation to speeding limits, parking regulations, and - one can only imagine - other aspects of local government road rules that so annoy any free spirit in charge of a motor vehicle. He complained about ''dodging the ridiculous speeding and parking [rules] and all the nanny-state [conditions] that we have down here in Australia''.
Yet he was also more broad-ranging in his thoughts:
"''I think we've got to read an instruction book when we get out of bed - what we can do and what we can't do … put a yellow vest on and all that sort of stuff...''
His off the cuff comments didn't suit the new moral crusaders, however. Taking time out from ad nauseum 'when-are-you-people-going-to-learn' remarks, various policemen and government ministers attacked Mr. Webber's free thought.
Deputy Police Commissioner Ken Lay said some of Webber’s fans were alive because of Victoria’s aggressive approach to road safety.
‘‘We’ve got probably one of the best road safety track records in the world, so I make no apology for our aggressive approach,’’ he told a local radio station.
No apology. Aggressive indeed. This is the voice of the self-empowered moral high groundsmen. Mark Webber made a observation, based on his experience as a international journeyman and - no doubt - from a fond remembrance of his younger life here in Australia.
But that has all changed. In the future whether young men from Queanbeyan grow up to become F1 drivers is neither here nor there; but if they grow up and cannot question the laws that govern their existence, then we might all just as well hand our car keys in now.
Tuesday, February 23, 2010
February: a Dry Area
We are nearly at the end of February, and therefore at the end of the ridiculous month-long statement of sanctimonious self-importance that is Feb Fast. This cause sees participants abstain from alcohol for the month, and like Movember and other such awareness months, the idea is to raise money for charities which support people suffering from some sort of ailment or social disease, such as drug addiction, mental health problems, and so on. The outcome - that monies go from the private purse into these charitable organisations - is all fine and good, and Feb Fast has already raised a half a mill. But what an annoying month of self-aggrandizing puff the rest of us have to put up with, and not just from common or garden-variety goody-goodies telling us why they are not drinking, but also from would-be celebrities who use the awareness cause as a shameless, self-promotion exercise.
The Feb Fast website even includes a Famous Feb Fasters feature, to assist this strategy. One of the celebs is Angry Anderson…
Celebrity and charity now go hand in hand, particularly as charity is such an effective way to maintain a public profile. And your PR Agent will probably "do the right thing" and not charge you for letting the media know about your passion for high-profile charitable causes. So it’s a win-win for everything and everyone. Except perhaps quiet philanthropy. And publicans
The Feb Fast website even includes a Famous Feb Fasters feature, to assist this strategy. One of the celebs is Angry Anderson…
Celebrity and charity now go hand in hand, particularly as charity is such an effective way to maintain a public profile. And your PR Agent will probably "do the right thing" and not charge you for letting the media know about your passion for high-profile charitable causes. So it’s a win-win for everything and everyone. Except perhaps quiet philanthropy. And publicans
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
